Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Action Research/ Reflective Fieldnote #3

Over the past two weeks, I've been conducting ACTION RESEARCH in regards to vocabulary acquisition in a beginner level vocabulay course I've been teaching. I've often struggled teaching beginner vocabulary. It's very easy to teach; It's very difficult to teach. It's easy when compiling words like: happy, sad, shirt, dark, walk, run, etc. I can show pictures or demonstrate those, but it's EXHAUSTING! And what about, have, wish, hope, etc.? Is it easier to just let them use the translation dictionary?

I've struggled with this because I really don't know which method is best. If I let them use dictionaries, am I being lazy? They want to use them, so why not just let them? How will I use context clues when it seems they can barely put anything into context, yet? However, I often read that using dictionaries is like using permanent crutches. Somewhere within in me I believe this is true, and I feel like kicking myself whenever I let them open the dictionaries. I was glad for the action research project because I needed to know. How else could I improve practice?

In my study, I examined two methods of vocabulary instruction in order to identify the teaching method most effective for vocabulary instruction. I used action research to identify if beginner ESL students acquire new vocabulary more effectively by using translation dictionaries and memorizing or by studying context clues through inductive method. Action research is a great tool because it guided me through my instruction through experimentation and reflection to create a better method of instruction, and also, to ease my doubts.

I found that translation dictionaries do not help in long-term retrieval of new vocabulary. In all cases, students who used the dictionaries retained the words for shorter periods of time and were not able to use the words appropriately or effectively when asked to use the words in context. For context clues, I used a variety of methods, all of which included some type of interaction -- computer interactive program, pair work, or with teacher. This approach was successful. They learned from eachother and demonstrated higher levels of achievement.

I kind of figured this would be my result, but I was glad to have the opportunity to experiment with it. Action research helped my students and helped me, and I hope to conduct such studies more often.. As a teacher, it helped bring excitement back into my teaching day. It also helped me to utilize new ideas, and things I've learned or read about, but never tried.

My suggestion to teachers is that in all subjects some type of action research is necessary on some level. It revitalizes the classroom and more importantly, it works to show a positive result in learning, which is why we are all here in the first place.